Skip to main content

Introduction to PFAS

PFAS Litigation Understanding the Legal and Environmental ImplicationsPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have become a major environmental and public health concern due to their widespread use and persistence in the environment. Often called “forever chemicals” because they do not break down easily, PFAS are found in water, soil, and even the human bloodstream. The rising awareness of PFAS contamination has led to a surge in litigation, with numerous lawsuits being filed against manufacturers and users of these chemicals. This blog will explore the complexities of PFAS litigation, the challenges of proving liability, and how MRC supports legal teams navigating these cases.

What Are PFAS?

PFAS are a group of man-made chemicals used in various industrial applications and consumer products due to their water- and grease-resistant properties. They are commonly found in items such as non-stick cookware, stain-resistant fabrics, firefighting foams, and food packaging. Due to their widespread use and persistence, PFAS have been detected in drinking water, soil, and even in human blood. Studies have linked PFAS exposure to various health issues, including cancer, liver damage, thyroid disease, and immune system disorders.

The Growing Concern and Legal Landscape

The environmental persistence and potential health risks associated with PFAS have led to increased regulatory scrutiny and a wave of litigation. Key issues in PFAS litigation include:

  • Contamination of Drinking Water: PFAS contamination of groundwater and drinking water supplies has led to significant public health concerns. Municipalities, water districts, and private well owners are among those filing lawsuits to hold PFAS manufacturers and users accountable for contamination.
  • Regulatory Action: Governments at various levels are enacting stricter regulations on PFAS use and contamination limits. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established health advisories for PFAS in drinking water, and some states have set their own enforceable limits.
  • Litigation Against Manufacturers: Numerous lawsuits have been filed against PFAS manufacturers, including major chemical companies, alleging that they knowingly released these harmful substances into the environment. These lawsuits seek to recover the costs of cleaning up contaminated sites, providing safe drinking water, and monitoring health impacts.

Challenges in PFAS Litigation

Proving liability in PFAS litigation presents several challenges:

  • Complexity of Exposure Pathways: PFAS can spread through various pathways, including air, water, and soil. Identifying the exact source of contamination and linking it to specific defendants can be difficult.
  • Long-Term Persistence: PFAS are known for their persistence in the environment and human body, making it challenging to establish a timeline for exposure and subsequent health effects. This long-term persistence complicates the process of linking specific exposures to health outcomes.
  • Scientific Uncertainty: While studies have shown associations between PFAS exposure and health effects, proving causation in individual cases can be challenging. The variability in individual susceptibility and exposure levels adds to the complexity of establishing a direct link between PFAS and specific health conditions.
  • Scope of Damages: The widespread presence of PFAS means that the scope of potential damages is vast. Plaintiffs may seek compensation for a wide range of costs, including medical monitoring, property devaluation, environmental remediation, and health care expenses.

How MRC Supports Legal Teams in PFAS Cases

Navigating PFAS litigation requires specialized expertise and a strategic approach to evidence gathering and analysis. MRC provides comprehensive support to legal teams involved in PFAS cases by offering the following services:

Record Retrieval and Documentation:

MRC excels in retrieving and organizing relevant records, including historical manufacturing documents, regulatory filings, and environmental reports. These records are crucial for establishing the timeline of PFAS use, identifying potential sources of contamination, and supporting liability claims.

Exposure Data Analysis:

MRC’s data analysis capabilities enable legal teams to assess exposure levels and identify patterns of contamination. By analyzing environmental data, including water and soil samples, MRC helps attorneys understand the extent of PFAS contamination and its potential impact on affected communities.

Insights into Health Effects:

MRC’s team of experts provides valuable insights into the potential health effects of PFAS exposure. They analyze medical records and scientific studies to help establish links between PFAS exposure and reported health outcomes. This expertise is critical for building a compelling case and effectively communicating the risks associated with PFAS.

Conclusion

PFAS litigation represents a significant and growing area of environmental and health-related legal action. The challenges of proving liability and demonstrating the impact of PFAS exposure require specialized expertise and a thorough understanding of both legal and scientific issues. MRC’s comprehensive support in PFAS cases, from record retrieval to expert analysis, equips legal teams with the tools they need to navigate these complex cases successfully. By partnering with MRC, attorneys can effectively address the legal and environmental implications of PFAS, advocating for justice and accountability.